Monday, March 26, 2007

Exercise 001 - Todd Harris

My first exercise is to imitate a Todd Harris digital painting. (It must be said, I luuurv Todd's work)


But what to draw?


I felt I needed to practice my female forms, and I wanted to make it a little dynamic, perhaps with cloth (something else I need practice on).


First: The initial pencil sketch...
Not dynamic enough.

Sketch number 2...
I liked this a lot better, but the angle might be wrong since it's making her look large, when she should be looking weak.

Sketch number 3...

Too strong.
(I thought of a different direction to the scene, but no).


Sketch number 3...

This is a better angle, but a crappier drawing. It would have been difficult to get the image looking as good as the second, so I chose to keep with a less frightening angle, but more detail in the form itself. Sketch number 2 wins.

I trace this onto tracing paper, putting details in as I go (and as I think of them)...

Turns out she's a school girl. How about that, eh? The gun was a crazy last minute add-on. I thought: Whatever's chasing her will be massive, and if I ever get to a third iteration of this scene I want her to fire at it with something. A ridiculously huge machine gun was the obvious choice.

This is a progression of detail.

What I learnt during this process is that to get this look I needed to futz with the brush options. Even though you don't see it in the final product (below) I managed to replicate this look by putting a canvas texture within the brush option itself instead of using a canvas-type brush. Big difference.

The easiest way to do this (that I could find) is to open a new file, put a texture filter over a white page (canvas), then find the edges of this tiled texture. Crop this, then save this as a texture (define pattern). This will then show up in the brush options. Viola!

In the end, I finished this image simply to finish it. The look I was going for I never managed to get, and so the Todd Harris experiment was ...essentially... a failure in the ultimate sense, but I did learn a little about brush techniques. So it wasn't a total failure. Small steps for now.

Addendum:

Milenko, you provided a clear vision with your quick critique in the comments section. Thanks! I always take good criticism as art direction so I was very interested to see what the image would look like pushed a bit further. I think it's a definite improvement, but I'm still not 100% with it for some inexplicable reason. As artists are their own worst critics then I'm doing fairly well to be only this disappointed with it. :) Thanks again.

5 comments:

FerdinandKreozot said...

Is there a sketch?
I can not see it :)
And I was looking forward to seeing it.

Anyhow, exercise begins, I guess.
Does 2 weeks start now?

Cheers,

Milenko

Mat Brady said...

Ah... I let you know about this a *liiitle* bit before it was ready. Oh well, at least it's up now.

Two weeks actually started about two months ago, but I was too busy up until recently. I'll wait until you have a crack at it, then we'll synchronise our watches again.

Meanwhile I'll start thinking about the next exercise. Hmm...

Cheers,
Mat

FerdinandKreozot said...

Aha.
Gotcha.
You did well. But I think you did Mat.
But instead considering it a failure, I would consider it a solid Mat piece.
And Todd is a cool dude but he does fudge too.
Like Simon Bisley (not that i am comparing them, and if I did, I would get todd ahead, simply because his stuff is more fun and has more life) Todd is awesome at painting volumes, and painting detail and light to draw attention to the particular portion of his image.
End result is great, and I usualy get great joy from looking at his work, but sometimes there's an awkward piece of construction there, or something is on the wrong plane and it bugs me a bit. Not that I am anywhere near him (quality of my work wise) to patronise, I purely look from an angle of a fan kid, and I complain about not getting my "masterpiece fix" every time I look at his next piece.
Only crit I could point to this one you did here is that you paid equal attention everywhere on the painting.
It's almost as if you should put even more detail in her face, and focus your light there, with some more shine on the gun, and put her legs and feet in the shaddow, much more simplified almost just sillhouetted, so the eye does not run there.
But this is mostly me talking shit dude, so do not stress.
It could also be me jelous at you for getting this far while I am still fucking arround with some shitty sketches.
In my books, you did awesomely.

Cheers mate,

Milenko

Mat Brady said...

Advice taken and addendum added.
Go check it out. :)

ross said...

hi
i like school girls